After 150m years as a fossil, Belemnotheutis antiquus takes up its pen

 

The fossil record has been rewritten — in 150-million-year-old squid ink. The discovery of the perfectly preserved ink sac of a the inch-long cephalopod, a type of squid, has astonished palaeontologists.

 

The squid came from a site near Christian Malford in Wiltshire that is reknowned for producing extremely well-preserved fossils, but this is believed to the first time squid ink has been reconstituted.

 

To mark the occasion the scientists used the squid’s own ink to draw a picture of it and wrote the specimen’s Latin name, Belemnotheutis antiquus. Before it could be used, the pitch-black ink had to be returned to liquid form with a solution of ammonia.

 

The amazing preservation was the result of what palaeontologists call the Medusa effect - an unusually fast process of fossilisation — as the creatures turned to stone so quickly.

 

The dig was conducted by the British Geological Survey in an attempt to identify a lost site that produced vast quantities of well-preserved fossils during the Victorian era.

 

Dr Phil Wilby, who led the dig, said: “It’s among the world’s best fossil preservation. It’s a squid-like creature, but it’s not like anything we have in the world today.

 

“You really don’t imagine anything so soft could be so well preserved three dimensionally.

 

“It still looks as if it is modern squid ink. It’s absolutely incredible to find something like this. We felt that drawing the animal with it would be the ultimate self-portrait.

 

“It’s very valuable material so we won’t be using up any more of it now we’ve done the first test.”

 

Alongside the ink sac, palaeontologists also found other examples of the squid, and other creatures with all their soft parts preserved.

 

Dr Wilby said: “About 155 million years ago, millions of these animals were dying in this precise area. We don’t know why that is. In normal circumstances, the decomposition process means only the hard parts of animal are preserved, such as the bones, shell and teeth. The odds of this find are easily a billion to one and probably much greater.

 

“We call it the Medusa effect: specimens turn to stone within a matter of days, before the soft parts can be eaten away.

 

“I hope the discovery will help us better understand why things are fossilised in this way - what it is about the area that allows it to happen so quickly. Throughout the world there are perhaps a few dozen examples of soft parts being preserved, but this is really special.

 

“I can dissect them as if they are living animals. You can even tell whether it was a fast or slow swimmer, by looking at all the muscle fibres.”

 

The V site was discovered in the 1840s during the construction of the Great Western Railway but its exact location had been forgotten.

 

Dr Wilby said: “We were trying to find the site of a dig which took place in the 1840s, where we knew fossils were found with their soft parts preserved. We had the name of the village and knew it was next to the Victorian Great Western Railway.

 

“When we reached the site, we drilled trial holes into the ground until we spotted one of the fossils coming out with the end of the drill.

 

“We only had ten days to work in and we excavated 240 tonnes of rock.

 

“In total we found a couple of dozen specimens with soft parts such as muscles and eyes intact, but this was even more exciting.”

 

The specimen is now in the British Geological Survey collection in Nottingham. Part of the ink sac has been sent to Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, for more detailed chemical analysis.

 

並有6人評論:

Jason Loxton wrote:

 

Al/Jake: Fossilization time depends on a number of factors, but mineralization can, in rare circumstances, happen very rapidly. There is a whole experimental field that studies this: taphonomy. I invite you both to check it out, it's fascinating. Radiometric dating is a very well-established science that has been verified by cross-checking multiple isotopes and, in the case of Carbon-14 (which Jake is correct is only useful for recent material) by checking against historical events or against other independent dating methods, such as dendo- or varve chronology. Note though: the date of a fossil can almost never be determined directly, but is deduced by dating the magnetic or isotopic signature of surrounding rocks.

 

AL Bingleton wrote:

Carbon 14 dating itself is not proven.
It also depends on how old you expect something to be, to make it fit a time table. According to uniformitarian assumptions there should be no C14 left in anything to measure after 50,000 years or so.


Jake A wrote:

AL Bingleton, they dont guess the age on the fact it is a fossil! it doesn't matter how quickly it formed. The age of fossils can determined by carbon dateing, which works out the aproximate age based on the halflife of the radioisotopic carbon-14, although for something this old, other methods such as relative dating are probably used.


AL Bingleton wrote:

"150-million-year-old squid ink"
This proves one thing only, it is not that old.
"Parts turn to stone in a matter of days"?? So fossils don't have to be millions of years own then.


Farrukh Imran wrote:

Impressive!

 

Hugh M wrote:

Absolutely incredible.
 

下面是圖片與文字說明:

The chance of discovering a squid's ink sac preserved well enough to allow reconstitution of the ink was estimated at greater than a billion to one
arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜

    化石狂 發表在 痞客邦 留言(2) 人氣()